Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Articles
    Corporate/Business

  • Trouble With Your Co-Tenant? Partition of Real Property and Sale of Real Property with Division of Proceeds
    • Environmental

  • EPA’s New Enforcement Priorities Target the Energy Extraction Industry
  • West Virginia Legislature Voices Opposition to EPA Intrusion into State Water Quality Rulemaking
  • EPA Proposing New Enforcement Priorities
  • EPA Releases Notice of Data Availability Regarding Forthcoming UIC Rules for CO2 Injection Wells
  • Opposition to Coal Mining in West Virginia: It's Not About the Law
  • Coal Combustion Ash Disposal: TVA Breach Leads to Push for New Regulations, Lawsuits
  • The Clean Water Act Becomes a Primary Weapon in the Fight to Stop Coal Mining
  • New Guidance for “Jurisdictional Waters” under Clean Water Act
  • OSM Finalizes Stream Buffer Zone Rule
  • EPA Proposes UIC Rules for CO2 Injection Wells
  • Applying the Three “R’s” to RCRA: Analysis of the EPA’s New Solid Waste Recycling Exclusion
  • Army Corps of Engineers Issues New Regulatory Guidance on Jurisdictional Determinations
  • Energy Companies and Climate Change Regulation
  • Federal Court Revokes Valley Fill Permits
  • OSM Publishes (Yet Another) Proposal to Revise Ownership and Control Regulations
  • Supreme Court Limits Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction Over Streams.
  • States Propose Alternative to Mercury Trading Program.
  • Northeastern States Establish Program to Reduce Power Plant Emissions.
  • Reclamation Standards Amended.
  • OSM Must Formally Consider Alternatives in Permit Process.
  • Permit Not Required for Water Transfers.
  • West Virginia Proposes to Permanently Adopt Revised Aluminum Standard.
  • Passive Landowner Can Be Liable for Naturally Occurring Discharges.
  • Bar on Citizen Enforcement Does Not Apply to Suits Seeking Injunctive or Declaratory Relief.
  • Federal Court Rejects Challenge to Kentucky Antidegradation Rules.
  • Sixth Circuit Reverses Course; Upholds Remining Rules.
  • TMDLs Require Daily Discharge Limit.
  • Groups Challenge Individual Permits Issued by Corps of Engineers.
  • Corps of Engineers and West Virginia Developing Integrated Permitting Process
  • Appeals Court Reinstates Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 21.
  • EPA to Consider Revisions to Emission Control Regulations for Preparation Plants.
  • Groups Challenge EPA’s Position on IGCC for New Coal-fired Power Plants.
  • Opinions of Note
  • Kentucky Seeks to Administer Section 404 of Clean Water Act
  • Proposed Legislation Encourages Voluntary Reclamation of Abandoned Mine Sites
  • EPA To Apply Hourly Emissions Test for New Source Review
  • EPA Air Rule Invalid for Failure to Comply With Notice Requirements
  • Federal Court Vacates Approval of Definition of Material Damage in West Virginia Mining Rules
  • West Virginia Plans to Reduce Metal Discharges in Coal River Watershed
  • Amendments to Endangered Species Act Would Compensate Landowners for Use Restrictions
  • Legal Challenge to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Dismissed As 'Non-Justiciable Political Question'
  • EPA Proposes Rule to Implement Standard for Reducing Emissions of Fine Particulate Matter
  • Groups Challenge Federal Government's Support of Fossil Fuel Projects
  • Northeastern States Propose Greenhouse Gas Management Program
  • EPA Announces Policy That Permits Are Not Required for Water Transfers
  • EPA Announces Plan for Flexible Title V Air Permits
  • EPA Announces Final Rule Establishing the Criteria for All "Appropriate Inquiry Assessments"
  • Mine-Scarred Land and Brownfields
  • Kentucky Brownfields Redevelopment Program
  • Mercury Rule Under Attack; EPA Will Reconsider Provisions
    • General Information

  • Appalachian Coal Industry Faces Challenges in 2010
  • Federal Appeals Court Once Again Gives New Life to Coal Industry in West Virginia
  • Carbon Capture and Storage: Cornerstone of a Sound Energy Policy
  • West Virginia Legal Culture and its Effect on the Coal Industry
  • Coal Law Update
  • Cows a Major Source of Air Pollution; Emission Controls Contemplated
  • You Have No Idea: Environmental Regulation of the Coal Industry Today
    • Labor & Employment

  • The Employee Free Choice Act and the 111th Congress
  • Preventive Maintenance in the Workplace Before Passage of the EFCA
  • New Legislation Protects Job Rights Of Individuals Undertaking Military Service
  • Employer's Granting Of FMLA Leave May Preclude Subsequent Challenge To Employee's Entitlement To Leave
  • Unique Nature of the Coal Mining Industry -- Is NLRB Law for Imposing Derivative Labor Organizations Different for the Coal Industry
    • Litigation

  • Federal Judge Denies Obama Administration's Motion to Vacate the Stream Buffer Zone Rule
  • Double Jeopardy? Citizen Suit May Proceed Despite Government Enforcement Action
  • Ohio Appellate Court Ruling Helps Ensure Real Property Rights
  • West Virginia Supreme Court Reverses Trial Court Rulings, Reinstates Flood Litigation Cases
  • Conflicts in Mineral Development
  • Supreme Court Reduces Punitive Damage Award
  • Punitive Damages for Breach of a Commercial Sales Contract in West Virginia
  • West Virginia Modifies ''Deliberate Intent'' Liability for Employers
  • Groups Challenge Validity of West Virginia Coal Road System.
  • Recent Decision of Kentucky Supreme Court
    • Mine Safety and Health (MSHA)

  • MSHA - Whose Plan Is It?
  • New Federal Requirements for Coal Barges and Other Vessels
  • Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics: The Truth Behind MSHA Penalty Challenges
  • “Flagrant” Violations Under the Mine Act: What’s a Little More Ambiguity Among Friends?
  • Defending MSHA Enforcement Actions Part II
  • Defending MSHA Enforcement Actions
  • One of These Things is Not Like the Other
  • Mining Engineer Liability under the Mine Act: Fact or Fiction?
  • White Paper On MSHA's Proposed Regs. -- 30 CFR Part 66
  • Fire, Ready, Aim - Gotcha!
  • Breaking the Bank: An Overview of MSHA's New Civil Penalty Formula
  • The Importance Of Managing Your MSHA Citation History
  • Individual Criminal and Civil Liability Under Section 110(C) Of the Federal Mine Safety and Health A
    • People in the News

  • Chambers USA Recognizes 28 Dinsmore & Shohl Attorneys as Leading Business Lawyers
  • Best Lawyers® 2009 Ranks Dinsmore & Shohl #1 in the United States for Mining Law
  • Dinsmore & Shohl Recieves Top Tanking by Chambers USA
  • 76 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP Attorneys Named to The Best Lawyers in America®
  • Natural Resources Practice Highlighted in The National Law Journal
  • Dinsmore & Shohl LLP Attorney Named to Who's Who Legal

    		•

    Disclaimer
    Dinsmore & Shohl LLP is a member of     AFLA 
    © 2006 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.
    View our     Privacy Policy
    THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT